<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s Wrong with Digg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smoblogger.com/whats-wrong-with-digg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smoblogger.com/whats-wrong-with-digg/</link>
	<description>The Social Media Optimization Blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:45:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: web developpeur</title>
		<link>http://www.smoblogger.com/whats-wrong-with-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>web developpeur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoblogger.com/?p=394#comment-313</guid>
		<description>All goes fine, the roads of Digg are impenetrable...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All goes fine, the roads of Digg are impenetrable&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saki</title>
		<link>http://www.smoblogger.com/whats-wrong-with-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Saki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoblogger.com/?p=394#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Yup, they saw it for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, they saw it for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMO Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.smoblogger.com/whats-wrong-with-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>SMO Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoblogger.com/?p=394#comment-287</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I had thought about the buries but it seemed like even with the buries, it would have been promoted to the front page. Well, we can be sure an editor at Digg at least saw it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I had thought about the buries but it seemed like even with the buries, it would have been promoted to the front page. Well, we can be sure an editor at Digg at least saw it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saki</title>
		<link>http://www.smoblogger.com/whats-wrong-with-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Saki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoblogger.com/?p=394#comment-285</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s because of Digg algorithm... differentiality is more important than number of Diggs, and there were probably  buries too since article is controversial (I can&#039;t seem to find in on the web now?). 

Anywayz  it will all change in new Digg but we will see for the better or not</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s because of Digg algorithm&#8230; differentiality is more important than number of Diggs, and there were probably  buries too since article is controversial (I can&#8217;t seem to find in on the web now?). </p>
<p>Anywayz  it will all change in new Digg but we will see for the better or not</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

