No, it’s not a question, but a statement. See?
Here’s a digg.com submission of a well-written article critical of the new Digg V4. It received 321 votes in about one day’s time, yet did not make it to the Digg front page. Can’t take the criticism?
More SMO Blog Posts Like This
Tags: Digg, Digg Poweruser, Social Media, Social Media Sites
What’s Wrong with Digg was posted to SMO Blogger on Tuesday, July 13th, 2010 at 10:54 am and is filed under Digg.
You can follow any comments to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a comment, or trackback from your own site.
SMO Blogger is a do follow comment blog! In return for your excellent comments you can insert your link in your comment URL field. Please do not post unmeaningful or promotional comments as those will not be published on this SMO blog.
It’s because of Digg algorithm… differentiality is more important than number of Diggs, and there were probably buries too since article is controversial (I can’t seem to find in on the web now?).
Anywayz it will all change in new Digg but we will see for the better or not
Yeah, I had thought about the buries but it seemed like even with the buries, it would have been promoted to the front page. Well, we can be sure an editor at Digg at least saw it.
Yup, they saw it for sure.
All goes fine, the roads of Digg are impenetrable…