<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Squarespace Blogging Platform?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smoblogger.com/squarespace-blogging-platform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smoblogger.com/squarespace-blogging-platform/</link>
	<description>The Social Media Optimization Blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:25:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMO Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.smoblogger.com/squarespace-blogging-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>SMO Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoblogger.com/squarespace-blogging-platform/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I gotcha. Thanks for pointing out the fact that just the opposite of what we expect can often happen with search engine rankings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotcha. Thanks for pointing out the fact that just the opposite of what we expect can often happen with search engine rankings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Casalena</title>
		<link>http://www.smoblogger.com/squarespace-blogging-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Casalena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoblogger.com/squarespace-blogging-platform/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>If it means anything to your analysis, here&#039;s an interesting item:  At Squarespace, for a while, we had very custom legacy code running &#039;www.squarespace.com&#039;.  About a month ago, we switched to using Squarespace entirely (meaning that &#039;www.squarespace.com&#039; is just a Squarespace account called &#039;www&#039;).  This meant that all of the underlying code changed for our front site, which I was positive was going to reduce our rankings for SOME keywords.

The opposite happened.  We actually jumped a few spots on all of our keywords, and we gained 15 places on extremely highly competitive keywords like &quot;build a website&quot;.  We use the same basic platform for that site that everyone else on Squarespace gets, and we all have the same IP.

Hope this is of some value!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it means anything to your analysis, here&#8217;s an interesting item:  At Squarespace, for a while, we had very custom legacy code running &#8216;www.squarespace.com&#8217;.  About a month ago, we switched to using Squarespace entirely (meaning that &#8216;www.squarespace.com&#8217; is just a Squarespace account called &#8216;www&#8217;).  This meant that all of the underlying code changed for our front site, which I was positive was going to reduce our rankings for SOME keywords.</p>
<p>The opposite happened.  We actually jumped a few spots on all of our keywords, and we gained 15 places on extremely highly competitive keywords like &#8220;build a website&#8221;.  We use the same basic platform for that site that everyone else on Squarespace gets, and we all have the same IP.</p>
<p>Hope this is of some value!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
