<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flickr Nofollow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smoblogger.com/flickr-nofollow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smoblogger.com/flickr-nofollow/</link>
	<description>The Social Media Optimization Blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:25:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.smoblogger.com/flickr-nofollow/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoblogger.com/flickr-nofollow/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Basically Google strives for 2 things. Transparency and Relevance! For Relevant Texts and Visuals. Therefore NoFollow Policy of e.g. Flickr is a Bad Development.

Patrick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically Google strives for 2 things. Transparency and Relevance! For Relevant Texts and Visuals. Therefore NoFollow Policy of e.g. Flickr is a Bad Development.</p>
<p>Patrick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMO Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.smoblogger.com/flickr-nofollow/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>SMO Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 03:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoblogger.com/flickr-nofollow/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Yes, I agree. I think some SMO&#039;ers invested quite a lot there and I guess their assumption was that it would always be followed. I know mine was. I guess any site can go nofollow at any time, these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I agree. I think some SMO&#8217;ers invested quite a lot there and I guess their assumption was that it would always be followed. I know mine was. I guess any site can go nofollow at any time, these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News girl</title>
		<link>http://www.smoblogger.com/flickr-nofollow/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>News girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 12:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoblogger.com/flickr-nofollow/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>We all have to differentiate our sources of links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all have to differentiate our sources of links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
